Yar, you be here: Underworld (Widescreen Edition) > Customer Reviews

Underworld (Widescreen Edition) Customer Reviews (40 - 42 of 127 Reviews)

On Par With Big Budgets
I just saw this movie, rented it over this weekend. Although there might be some slight inconsistencies (I think they squeazed two nights into one long night without pause) the pacing of the story keeps you from worrying about it. The movie takes a more secular or mundane route for explaining the existence of vampires and werewolves. For not being a big budget movie, they did well with what they had. It is a bit bloody, but considering the subject matter it is rather tame, and is handled more cinematically, than graphically.

As for the question of what a vampire/werewolf would look like, I think you have to consider he was not in werewolf form when he was bitten and he was given enzymes to keep him from transforming to a werewolf, hence, the form would not be very wolf like until the individual in question could have the enzymes take their course. Remember, that character had never fully transformed into a wolf form, therefore, his structure would not be fully changed.

All in all I thought it was a well done movie, and you would never know that it was made with a fraction of the money spent on the Matrix's second movie! I've heard the "extended cut" is even better.

Take the matrix and throw in some vampires and werewolves!
Tight leather outfits, gothic look, lots of automatic weapons and just enough vampire lore to make it all fit. Good stuff. Not overly gory. Really quite tame. The werewolves are a bit scary. Not for the young.

The Greatest DVD Of All Time
I cried when it came in the mail and it was very hard to contain myself while I watched it. Thank you for this gift.

Previous Page

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Next Page